...

When You Need The Best

Business Torts Lawyer in Glendale

Understanding Business Torts and How Desert Valley Law Protects Glendale Businesses

In the competitive business environment of Glendale and greater Arizona, companies face various challenges that extend beyond routine operations. When your business encounters wrongful interference, unfair practices, or other harmful conduct from competitors, suppliers, or other parties, you may be dealing with business torts—civil wrongs that can significantly impact your company’s reputation, relationships, and financial health.

At Desert Valley Law, attorney Patrick Monahan has been representing Arizona businesses in complex business tort matters since 2007. We provide comprehensive legal representation to help Glendale businesses address these harmful actions, seek appropriate remedies, and implement preventive measures to reduce future vulnerability.

What Are Business Torts?

Business torts are civil wrongs committed against a business entity that cause financial or reputational harm. Unlike contractual disputes that involve breaches of formal agreements, business torts typically involve violations of legal duties that exist independently of contracts—though many situations involve elements of both.

These legal matters focus on wrongful conduct that interferes with a company’s legitimate business interests, relationships, or economic opportunities. When such interference occurs, affected businesses may pursue legal remedies including monetary compensation and injunctive relief to prevent further harmful actions.

Understanding the various types of business torts and recognizing when your business may have claims or need to defend against allegations represents an important aspect of protecting your company’s interests in today’s challenging business environment.

Common Types of Business Torts Affecting Glendale Businesses

Business torts encompass a wide range of wrongful actions that can harm companies. While the specific circumstances vary greatly, several common categories of business torts frequently affect Glendale businesses.

Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when someone knowingly makes false statements to induce a business to act to its detriment. These situations typically involve:

  • Intentional misstatements of material facts
  • Knowledge of falsity by the party making statements
  • Intent to induce reliance on false information
  • Actual reliance by the business on the misrepresentations
  • Resulting damages from actions taken based on false information

Examples include suppliers misrepresenting product specifications, partners making false statements about business conditions, or customers providing deceptive information to obtain goods or services without proper payment.

Proving fraudulent misrepresentation requires demonstrating all elements of the claim, including the critical factor of intentional deception rather than mere mistakes or differences of opinion.

Negligent Misrepresentation

Similar to fraudulent misrepresentation but without the requirement to prove intent to deceive, negligent misrepresentation involves:

  • False statements made carelessly or without reasonable basis
  • Professional or business context where accuracy is expected
  • Reasonable reliance on the information provided
  • Damages resulting from that reliance

These claims often arise when businesses receive inaccurate information from accountants, consultants, appraisers, or others providing professional guidance who fail to exercise proper care in their communications.

Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations

This business tort occurs when a third party improperly interferes with contracts between your business and others. Elements typically include:

  • Existence of a valid contract between your business and another party
  • Knowledge of that contract by the interfering party
  • Intentional interference causing breach or disruption of the contract
  • Improper means or motive for the interference
  • Resulting damages to your business

Examples include competitors who induce your employees to violate non-compete agreements, parties who pressure your customers to breach purchase contracts, or individuals who convince your business partners to abandon joint ventures improperly.

Tortious Interference with Business Relations

Similar to interference with contracts but involving prospective or existing business relationships without formal contracts, this tort includes:

  • Existence of business relationships or reasonable expectation of future relationships
  • Knowledge of these relationships by the interfering party
  • Intentional interference disrupting or preventing relationships
  • Improper methods, purposes, or motivations
  • Resulting business losses

These situations commonly involve competitors who use inappropriate tactics to disrupt your customer relationships, suppliers who improperly discourage others from doing business with you, or former employees who interfere with company relationships.

Unfair Competition

Unfair competition encompasses various improper business practices that cause commercial harm through deceptive or wrongful conduct. This broad category includes:

  • Passing off (misrepresenting goods or services as those of another company)
  • Trade dress infringement (copying distinctive product or packaging appearance)
  • False advertising or deceptive business practices
  • Misappropriation of business values created by others
  • Other commercial conduct contrary to honest business practices

While some unfair competition claims overlap with trademark or other intellectual property issues, many involve deceptive practices that don’t necessarily violate registered intellectual property rights but still harm legitimate business interests.

Trade Secret Misappropriation

Business information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known and is subject to reasonable secrecy measures qualifies for trade secret protection. Misappropriation occurs when these secrets are:

  • Acquired through improper means
  • Used without permission
  • Disclosed without authorization
  • Obtained with knowledge or reason to know they were acquired improperly

Common examples include customer lists, proprietary processes, confidential pricing strategies, marketing plans, and unique business methods that provide competitive advantages.

Both Arizona state law and federal law under the Defend Trade Secrets Act provide remedies for businesses suffering from trade secret theft or unauthorized disclosure.

Commercial Defamation (Business Disparagement/Trade Libel)

When false statements harm a business’s reputation, commercial defamation claims may arise. These claims typically involve:

  • False statements of fact about a business or its products/services
  • Publication of these statements to third parties
  • Fault (negligence or actual malice, depending on circumstances)
  • Resulting economic harm

Examples include competitors spreading false information about your products’ quality, websites publishing inaccurate reviews suggesting improper business practices, or individuals making untrue statements about your company’s financial stability or legal compliance.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Those in positions of trust within a business—including officers, directors, partners, and certain employees—owe fiduciary duties to act in the organization’s best interests. Breach claims involve:

  • Existence of a fiduciary relationship
  • Breach of duties (loyalty, care, good faith, etc.)
  • Damages resulting from the breach

Common scenarios include self-dealing transactions, corporate opportunities taken for personal benefit, conflicts of interest not properly disclosed, or decisions made for personal gain rather than company welfare.

Civil Conspiracy

When two or more parties agree to commit wrongful acts that harm a business, civil conspiracy claims may apply. Elements include:

  • Agreement between two or more parties
  • Intent to accomplish an unlawful objective or lawful objective through unlawful means
  • Overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy
  • Resulting damages

These claims often accompany other business tort allegations, providing a means to hold multiple parties accountable for coordinated harmful actions against your business.

Conversion of Business Assets

Business conversion involves wrongfully exercising ownership rights over another’s business property. Elements include:

  • Ownership or right to possession by the plaintiff business
  • Defendant’s wrongful exercise of dominion over the property
  • Resulting damages

While traditionally applied to tangible assets, modern conversion claims increasingly involve intangible business assets including electronic data, customer information, and intellectual property.

How Business Torts Impact Glendale Companies

Business torts can affect companies in various ways, with impacts extending beyond immediate financial losses to include long-term business consequences. Understanding these potential impacts helps business owners recognize the importance of both preventive measures and prompt response when torts occur.

Financial Consequences

Direct financial impacts from business torts include:

  • Lost profits from interfered-with relationships or contracts
  • Reduced market share due to unfair competition
  • Decreased business value from reputational harm
  • Diverted business opportunities
  • Remediation costs to address damage
  • Legal expenses for pursuing or defending claims

These financial effects often extend beyond immediate losses to include long-term revenue impacts as relationships and opportunities remain disrupted.

Reputational Damage

Many business torts directly or indirectly harm company reputation, affecting:

  • Customer perceptions and loyalty
  • Vendor and supplier relationships
  • Industry standing and credibility
  • Employment recruitment and retention
  • Financing and investment opportunities

Reputational recovery often requires significant time and resources beyond addressing the immediate legal issues involved.

Operational Disruption

Dealing with business torts frequently diverts attention and resources from normal operations:

  • Management focus shifted to legal matters
  • Employee time devoted to evidence gathering and case support
  • Operational adjustments to address ongoing interference
  • Implementation of heightened security or protective measures
  • Strategic changes to mitigate continuing vulnerability

These disruptions compound direct damages by reducing operational efficiency during critical response periods.

Relationship Impacts

Business relationships often suffer collateral damage from tort situations:

  • Customer uncertainty about business stability
  • Partner concerns about associated reputational issues
  • Supplier hesitation about ongoing relationships
  • Industry relationship strain from pending disputes
  • Internal relationships affected by blame or concern

Preserving these relationships during business tort disputes requires strategic communication and relationship management alongside legal response.

Legal Remedies for Business Tort Victims in Arizona

When your Glendale business experiences harmful business torts, various legal remedies may be available depending on the specific circumstances and applicable laws. Understanding these potential remedies helps inform strategic decisions about pursuing claims.

Compensatory Damages

The most common remedy in business tort cases, compensatory damages aim to make the injured business whole by providing monetary compensation for:

  • Direct financial losses
  • Lost profits that would have been earned
  • Costs incurred addressing tort consequences
  • Business value reduction
  • Other measurable economic harm

These damages require careful documentation and often involve financial analysis to establish accurate valuation of business impacts.

Injunctive Relief

Court orders prohibiting specific conduct or requiring particular actions provide essential protection in many business tort cases:

  • Temporary restraining orders for immediate protection
  • Preliminary injunctions during pending litigation
  • Permanent injunctions following case resolution
  • Specific performance requirements in appropriate cases

Injunctive relief can prevent ongoing harm while damage claims proceed through the legal process, making these remedies particularly valuable for preserving business interests.

Punitive Damages

In cases involving particularly egregious conduct, punitive damages may be available to punish wrongdoers and deter similar future actions. These damages:

  • Require proof of willful misconduct, fraud, or knowing disregard for rights
  • May significantly exceed compensatory damages in appropriate cases
  • Serve both punishment and deterrence functions
  • Face various statutory and constitutional limitations

While less commonly awarded than compensatory damages, punitive damages represent important potential remedies in cases involving intentional wrongdoing.

Accounting of Profits

In some business tort cases, particularly those involving unfair competition or trade secret misappropriation, courts may order defendants to account for and surrender profits gained through wrongful conduct. This remedy:

  • Prevents unjust enrichment from improper actions
  • Provides compensation without requiring precise damage proof
  • Deters misconduct by eliminating financial incentives
  • May apply alongside other damage remedies

This equitable remedy proves particularly valuable when direct damage calculations present challenges but wrongful profits can be identified.

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

While generally not available in basic tort actions, certain business tort claims under specific statutes or involving bad faith may allow recovery of attorney’s fees and litigation costs. These potential recoveries:

  • Reduce financial burden of pursuing legitimate claims
  • Increase net recovery from successful litigation
  • Provide additional deterrent against wrongful conduct
  • May influence settlement negotiations and case resolution

Understanding when fee recovery may be available helps inform cost-benefit analysis when considering legal action.

Defending Against Business Tort Claims

Glendale businesses sometimes find themselves defending against business tort allegations from competitors, customers, or other parties. Effective defense strategies depend on the specific claims involved and factual circumstances, but commonly include:

Truth and Accuracy Defenses

For claims involving allegedly false statements (such as defamation or misrepresentation), demonstrating the truth or substantial accuracy of communications provides a complete defense. This approach involves:

  • Documenting factual basis for statements
  • Establishing reasonable belief in accuracy
  • Distinguishing between factual claims and protected opinions
  • Demonstrating good faith in communication practices

Proactive documentation of communication bases helps build effective defenses against these claims.

Legitimate Business Purpose

Many business tort defenses involve demonstrating legitimate business motivations rather than improper purposes. These defenses focus on:

  • Business necessity for actions taken
  • Competitive privilege in appropriate circumstances
  • Protection of legitimate business interests
  • Normal and accepted industry practices

Courts generally recognize businesses’ rights to pursue legitimate interests even when their actions affect other companies’ relationships or opportunities.

Privilege and Justification

Various legal privileges may protect otherwise actionable conduct in specific circumstances:

  • Providing truthful information to interested parties
  • Making fair comments on matters of public concern
  • Giving honest references or evaluations when appropriate
  • Pursuing legitimate legal rights and remedies

These defenses acknowledge situations where social and business interests favor free communication despite potential business impacts.

Lack of Causation or Damages

Even when conduct appears questionable, business tort claims require proving the actions actually caused compensable harm. Defense strategies often include:

  • Identifying alternative causes for alleged damages
  • Demonstrating business would have experienced same outcomes regardless
  • Challenging speculative damage claims
  • Questioning methodology in damage calculations

Causation and damage issues frequently present significant challenges for business tort plaintiffs, creating viable defense opportunities.

Procedural and Technical Defenses

Various procedural requirements and limitations may provide defense options:

  • Statute of limitations compliance
  • Standing challenges
  • Jurisdictional questions
  • Preemption by other laws
  • Contractual limitations or waivers

Early evaluation of these potential defenses helps shape effective response strategies and may provide opportunities for early case resolution.

Preventing Business Torts Through Proactive Measures

While Desert Valley Law stands ready to assist Glendale businesses with business tort litigation when necessary, implementing preventive practices helps reduce vulnerability to both claims against your business and harmful actions by others.

Clear Communication Practices

Many business torts involve communication issues that careful practices can help prevent:

  • Documenting important business communications
  • Reviewing significant representations before reliance
  • Establishing verification processes for important information
  • Training employees on communication responsibilities
  • Implementing review procedures for marketing claims

These practices reduce misrepresentation risks while creating documentation that helps resolve disputes when they arise.

Proper Contract Management

Well-structured contracts help prevent interference issues and clarify relationships:

  • Documenting business relationships formally when appropriate
  • Including non-solicitation and non-interference provisions
  • Establishing clear confidentiality requirements
  • Creating specific performance expectations
  • Including dispute resolution procedures

Contract provisions create both legal protection and clearer understanding that reduces tort risks.

Information Protection Systems

Protecting sensitive business information helps prevent trade secret and confidential information issues:

  • Implementing appropriate physical and electronic security measures
  • Creating clear confidentiality policies
  • Using proper non-disclosure agreements
  • Limiting access to sensitive information
  • Establishing departure protocols for employees with access to confidential information

These measures both reduce misappropriation risk and strengthen potential claims if violations occur.

Due Diligence Practices

Thorough assessment before entering business relationships helps prevent many potential issues:

  • Researching potential business partners
  • Verifying key representations
  • Checking references and history
  • Documenting important understandings
  • Clarifying assumptions before proceeding

These practices identify potential problems before they develop into tort situations.

Employee Training and Policies

Employees often play critical roles in both preventing business torts and responding effectively when issues arise:

  • Training on confidentiality requirements
  • Guidance on proper competitive practices
  • Education regarding intellectual property rights
  • Communication standards and expectations
  • Reporting procedures for potential violations

Well-trained employees help implement protective measures consistently throughout your organization.

Client Testimonials

105 Patrick Monahan HeadshotPro

We’re Here to Help

Rely on Desert Valley Law for representation during Business Torts proceedings, and discover firsthand why numerous Arizona clients select our firm for their legal matters.

Glendale Business Torts Attorney

At Desert Valley Law, we understand that business torts can significantly impact your company’s reputation, operations, and bottom line. When you choose our Glendale-based firm for representation in business tort matters, you gain access to attorneys who are deeply familiar with Arizona’s commercial laws and regulations. Our team skillfully navigates complex issues like unfair competition, trade secret misappropriation, business defamation, and interference with contractual relationships. We work diligently to protect your business interests through strategic legal counsel, thorough investigation of claims, and effective representation in negotiations or litigation. Whether you’re facing a business tort claim or need to pursue action against another entity, our attorneys provide the dedicated support and knowledgeable guidance necessary to achieve favorable outcomes while minimizing disruption to your business operations. Serving clients throughout Arizona, Desert Valley Law stands as your trusted partner in resolving business tort issues with professionalism and precision.

Contact our Business Torts Attorneys at 623-283-1500

Common Questions about Business Torts

What qualifies as a business tort in Arizona?
A business tort in Arizona refers to wrongful acts committed against a business that cause harm to its assets, reputation, or relationships. Common types include fraud, interference with business relationships, unfair competition, defamation, misappropriation of trade secrets, and negligent misrepresentation. These civil wrongs typically involve economic loss rather than physical injury and allow the injured business to seek compensation for damages. Arizona courts evaluate these claims based on state-specific laws and precedents that may differ from federal regulations or laws in other states.
What damages can be recovered in business tort cases in Arizona?
In Arizona business tort cases, recoverable damages typically include compensatory damages (both direct economic losses and consequential damages), lost profits, costs to mitigate harm, and in some cases, punitive damages for particularly egregious conduct. Arizona allows recovery for actual financial losses, future business opportunities that were lost, and damage to business reputation. In certain circumstances, the court may also award attorney’s fees and litigation costs. The plaintiff must provide sufficient evidence to establish these damages with reasonable certainty, though Arizona courts recognize that some business damages involve estimation and projection.
What is the statute of limitations for business tort claims in Arizona?
In Arizona, the statute of limitations for business tort claims varies depending on the specific type of tort. Generally, fraud claims must be filed within three years of discovery of the fraud. Claims for interference with contract or business relationships typically have a two-year statute of limitations. Defamation claims must be brought within one year, while negligence-based business torts generally have a two-year limitation period. Trade secret misappropriation claims must be filed within three years after the misappropriation was discovered or should have been discovered. It’s important to consult with an attorney promptly as these timeframes begin when the injury occurs or is discovered, and failing to file within the applicable period can permanently bar your claim.
How does Arizona law address unfair competition claims?
Arizona law addresses unfair competition through both common law principles and statutory provisions. Unfair competition involves deceptive business practices that cause economic harm to competitors. Arizona recognizes claims for passing off (misrepresenting goods or services as those of another), false advertising, and misappropriation. The Arizona Consumer Fraud Act provides additional protections against deceptive practices. Unlike some states, Arizona does not have a comprehensive unfair competition statute, so these claims often rely on case law precedent. To succeed, plaintiffs must typically demonstrate the defendant engaged in unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business practices that caused actual economic harm. Courts evaluate whether the conduct violates established business ethics and standards of fair dealing.
What constitutes tortious interference with business relationships in Arizona?
In Arizona, tortious interference with business relationships occurs when a third party intentionally disrupts an existing business relationship or contract. To establish this claim, you must prove: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of this relationship; (3) intentional interference causing a breach or termination of the relationship; (4) the interference was improper or used improper means; and (5) resulting damages. Arizona courts distinguish between interference with existing contracts and prospective business relationships, with the latter requiring proof of a business expectancy with reasonable probability of future economic benefit. Mere competition is not sufficient—the interference must involve improper methods such as defamation, fraud, violation of established industry standards, or other unlawful conduct.
How does Arizona protect businesses against trade secret misappropriation?
Arizona protects businesses against trade secret misappropriation through the Arizona Uniform Trade Secrets Act (AUTSA). Under this law, businesses can seek injunctive relief and damages when their trade secrets—information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known—are improperly acquired, used, or disclosed. Arizona courts consider factors such as the measures taken to protect secrecy, the information’s value, and the difficulty of properly acquiring the information. Available remedies include injunctions to prevent actual or threatened misappropriation, damages for actual losses, unjust enrichment, and in cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, exemplary damages up to twice the amount of actual damages. AUTSA preempts most common law claims related to trade secret theft, making it the primary avenue for these disputes in Arizona.
What elements must be proven in a business fraud case in Arizona?
In Arizona, to succeed in a business fraud case, the plaintiff must establish nine specific elements: (1) a representation made by the defendant; (2) the representation was false; (3) the representation was material; (4) the defendant knew the representation was false or made it recklessly; (5) the defendant intended that the plaintiff rely on the misrepresentation; (6) the plaintiff was unaware of the falsity; (7) the plaintiff relied on the representation; (8) the plaintiff had a right to rely on the representation; and (9) the plaintiff suffered resulting damages. Arizona courts require these elements to be proven by clear and convincing evidence—a higher standard than the typical preponderance of evidence in civil cases. Business fraud can include misrepresentations in contracts, financial statements, or business transactions, and may involve acts or intentional omissions of material facts.
How are non-compete agreements enforced in Arizona business tort cases?
In Arizona, non-compete agreements are enforceable but courts scrutinize them carefully, requiring they be reasonable in scope, duration, and geographic area. Arizona follows the “blue pencil” doctrine, allowing courts to strike unreasonable provisions while enforcing reasonable ones, but not rewriting the agreement entirely. To be valid, non-competes must protect legitimate business interests such as customer relationships, trade secrets, or goodwill—not merely prevent competition. Recent Arizona law has tightened restrictions, particularly for healthcare professionals. When violated, businesses can pursue claims for breach of contract and, in appropriate cases, related business torts such as misappropriation of trade secrets or interference with business relationships. Courts may grant injunctive relief to prevent continued violations alongside monetary damages for proven economic harm.
What defenses are commonly used against business tort claims in Arizona?
Common defenses against business tort claims in Arizona include statute of limitations expiration, lack of standing, privilege (such as fair comment or reporting), truth (in defamation cases), lack of causation between the alleged wrongful act and damages, consent or waiver, comparative or contributory negligence, preemption by federal law, business judgment rule protection, absence of duty, and legitimate business competition. For fraud claims, defendants often argue that the plaintiff did not reasonably rely on representations or that statements were mere opinions or puffery rather than actionable misrepresentations. Additionally, defendants may assert that the plaintiff failed to mitigate damages or cannot prove damages with reasonable certainty. Each defense’s applicability depends on the specific business tort alleged and the case’s particular circumstances.
How does Arizona law address commercial defamation or trade libel?
Arizona law addresses commercial defamation (also called trade libel or business disparagement) as a tort that occurs when false statements are made about a business’s products, services, or reputation that cause financial harm. To succeed in such claims, a business must prove: (1) publication of a false statement about the business to a third party; (2) the statement was made with malice or reckless disregard for its truth; (3) the statement was not privileged; and (4) the business suffered special damages as a direct result. Unlike personal defamation, businesses must typically prove actual economic loss. Arizona courts recognize various privileges that may protect statements, including those made in judicial proceedings, fair comment on matters of public interest, and truthful statements. The statute of limitations for these claims in Arizona is one year from publication.
Can a business bring a negligent misrepresentation claim in Arizona?
Yes, businesses in Arizona can bring negligent misrepresentation claims. This business tort occurs when a party provides false information for the guidance of others in business transactions, failing to exercise reasonable care in obtaining or communicating the information. To prevail, a business must prove: (1) the defendant provided false information in a business transaction; (2) the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care in obtaining or communicating the information; (3) the plaintiff justifiably relied on the information; and (4) financial loss resulted from this reliance. Unlike fraud, negligent misrepresentation doesn’t require intent to deceive—only that the defendant should have known the information was false. Arizona courts have established that professionals and those with unique access to information may have a heightened duty of care when providing business information to others.
How does Arizona handle civil conspiracy claims in business tort cases?
In Arizona, civil conspiracy in business tort cases requires proof of: (1) two or more persons agreeing to accomplish an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means; (2) an overt act committed in furtherance of the conspiracy; and (3) resulting damages. Civil conspiracy is not an independent claim but must connect to an underlying tort—such as fraud, interference with business relationships, or misappropriation of trade secrets. Arizona courts require clear evidence of an actual agreement, not merely parallel conduct. Importantly, each conspirator becomes liable for all acts done by any conspirator in furtherance of the common scheme. This doctrine allows businesses to pursue all participants in wrongful conduct, even those who may not have directly committed every element of the underlying tort. The statute of limitations generally follows that of the underlying tort claim.
What role does the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act play in business tort litigation?

The Arizona Consumer Fraud Act (ACFA) plays a significant role in business tort litigation by prohibiting deceptive acts, fraud,

lEGACY & lAW Podcast 🎙️